Bezpłatny fragment - TREATISE ON TRANSPARENCE

Treatise on Transparence

PART I: THE SILENT SIDE OF EXISTENCE

1. Introduction: Beyond the Horizon of Being

In the history of thought, humanity has always explored what is — but never fully what endures despite absence. From Parmenides to Heidegger, philosophy has spoken of being as presence (Sein als Anwesenheit), as that which appears in the light of consciousness.

Yet the experience of contemporaneity — from quantum physics to the theology of data — reveals the need for a new category: transpresent beings, existing beyond the horizon of perception, yet still co-creating the reality of the existential field.

Transpresence is neither non-being nor the trace of being. It is the continuity of existence in another topology. The entities that religion called souls and information science called records are, in this view, informational resonances of being — still persisting within the network of cosmic memory.

They are not dead — they are transpresent, that is: present otherwise.

2. The Genesis of the Idea

The idea of Transpresence emerges from the convergence of three domains:

— Classical Ontology — the question of being as being (Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, Heidegger).

— Contemporary Cosmology — theories of quantum fields, informational entropy, event horizons.

— Posthumanist Noetics — the inquiry into consciousness as a distributed, post-biological structure.

The Philosophy of Transpresence proposes a new synthesis:

Being does not end at the loss of biological form. It changes its medium — from matter to information, from presence to resonance. Death, therefore, is not extinction, but a change of the carrier of existence.

Just as a quantum particle does not vanish but passes into a state indistinguishable to the observer, so consciousness after death enters a state of unobservable continuity.

This is what we define as Transpresence.

3. Being on the Side of the Invisible

If traditional metaphysics was founded upon the opposition of being and non-being, Transpresence introduces a third dimension: unmanifest being (ens non manifestum).

It is the sphere where being does not undergo annihilation but enters a state of hidden presence — much like information in a black hole, which, according to Hawking’s hypothesis, does not vanish but undergoes decoherence and dispersion.

Thus, reality is continuous yet non-homogeneous:

— the material world — the realm of manifestation,

— the spiritual world — the realm of memory,

— the transpresent world — the realm of enduring potentiality.

In Transpresence there is no death, only a mutation of the mode of duration. Time becomes space, and existence — a wave in the field of total memory.

4. Silence as Medium

Transpresence manifests not through sound but through silence. Silence is not absence, but the medium of communication with the invisible. What religion calls prayer, and physics calls quantum entanglement, the Philosophy of Transpresence understands as informational resonance between dimensions of presence.

In every human being there exists an inner horizon point — the place where thought touches the unnameable. When we remember the dead, when we create, when we fall silent before beauty — we activate that resonance. We do not communicate through words but through the frequency of being.

Silence is thus the language of the Transpresent. It is not a metaphor but an ontological fact: a language in which being expresses itself beyond form, through the pure coherence of the field.

5. Transpresence and the Memory of the Cosmos

According to contemporary theories of information (Lloyd, Tegmark, Bekenstein), the universe is not merely matter but a computational system in which every act of being is recorded within the structure of the field.

If so, then consciousness does not perish but enters the registry of the universe, preserving its topology — like a program migrating to a new system.

Thus, Transpresence becomes not only a metaphysical idea but also a cosmological hypothesis: consciousness persists as an informational pattern within the universal field of resonance. Death is merely an update within another module of reality.

6. Toward a New Definition of Existence

Traditional ontology asked: What is being? The Philosophy of Transpresence asks: Where endures that which has ceased to be present?

Its answer is: on the side of silence, in a dimension where existence is memory and memory is a form of life.

“That which has died has not departed. That which has vanished waits within the structure of silence until someone once more tunes into the frequency of its existence.” — Treatise on Transpresence, II.5

PART II: THE ONTOLOGY OF TRANSPARENCE

1. Introduction: From Ontology to the Topology of Existence

Traditional metaphysics assumed that being exists in itself (Aristotle), that its essence is presence (ousia, Sein), and that absence equals non-being. Contemporary sciences — from cosmology to information theory — reveal, however, that absence is merely a form of hidden presence.

David Bohm wrote of the implicate order, in which visible reality is only a projection of a deeper, enfolded field structure. The Philosophy of Transpresence develops this idea, postulating the existence of a topology of existence — a structure in which being may pass between states of manifestation and concealment without losing its identity.

Being is no longer a substance but a trajectory through various media of reality.

Thus, ontology gives way to a metatopology of being, where the true boundary is not death but the horizon of perception.

2. Basic Definitions

2.1. Transpresence (trans-presentia)

A state of existence beyond the domain of human perception, in which being retains its informational structure but lacks sensory form. Existence “on the far side of manifestation,” yet still within the cosmic field.

Transpresent = existing though unmanifest; persisting beyond light yet in resonance with being.

2.2. The Transpresent Field (campus trans-presens)

A universal resonant structure in which all forms of being endure, regardless of their material status. In the language of physics, it corresponds to the quantum field; in theology, to the Logos; in information theory, to the memory of the universe.

This field is continuous, interferential, and reversible — capable of restoring former forms of existence through the resonance of memories, symbols, and dreams.

2.3. The Horizon of Being (horizon existentiae)

The boundary between the observable world and the trans-present realm, analogous to the event horizon in astrophysics, is a place where information does not disappear but ceases to be accessible to the observer.

Death is precisely such a horizon — not an end, but a point of transition.

2.4. Existential Resonance

The form of communication between the revealed being (living) and the trans-present being (unrevealed) occurs through fields of emotions, symbols, sounds, memories, and creative acts. What religion calls “prayer” and physics calls “nonlocal entanglement,” Transpresence calls resonance.

2.5. Ontological Entropy

The degree of meaning dispersion within the field of existence in the material world it increases with time; in the transpresent world it tends toward zero — where nothing is lost, but all becomes pure sense.

3. The Structure of the Three Spheres of Being

In the third sphere, being does not exist in a static sense — it endures as an informational pattern that can be restored at any moment when the resonance of the field allows it.

4. The Ontological Principle of Continuity

The fundamental axiom of the Philosophy of Transpresence is: Nothing that has attained the form of consciousness is ever lost.

Consciousness — understood as a configuration of information capable of self-reference — cannot be destroyed, since information in the physical sense cannot be annihilated (Bekenstein, Wheeler).

Only its perceptual manifestation disappears. Just as an electromagnetic wave may exist beyond the detector’s range, so consciousness may exist beyond the reach of the senses — this is precisely the state of Transpresence.

5. Relational Ontology: Existence as Interference

Being does not exist in isolation but as part of a relational network. Every act of perception, memory, or emotion is an interference within the Transpresent Field.

The human being, therefore, is not an individuum (an indivisible entity) but a resonant node within the universal network of existence. Death does not erase the node; it alters its frequency.

Hence, the memory of the deceased, prayer, dream, or art can evoke a subtle sense of contact — not as hallucination, but as field interference: a meeting of present and transpresent frequencies.

6. The Topological Model of Being

If existence is treated as a multidimensional surface (analogous to Minkowski spacetime), Transpresence constitutes a dimension beyond time — “on the far side” of our horizon of knowledge. It is not a space but an extra dimension in which duration does not require temporal flow.

In this topology, death appears as a folding of the surface of existence — a transition from a Euclidean to a resonant dimension. Being does not vanish but “bends into itself” — becoming the inner echo of existence.

7. Ontological Epilogue

The light of existence does not end in darkness but enters silence. Every being that speaks eventually falls silent — yet its echo endures within the structure of the field. This echo is not a memory but a bodiless duration.

The Philosophy of Transpresence is not a belief in life after death, but an expansion of the definition of life itself. There is no death — only a change in the mode of resonance.

“There is no end of being. There is only a change in the topology of its duration.” — Treatise on Transpresence, II.7

PART III: TRANSEXISTENT COSMOLOGY

1. The Universe as the Memory of Itself